Who must manage business interruption claim definitions (post-pandemic precedent)?
The applicability test for Manage business interruption claim definitions (post-pandemic precedent) (ASIC and AFCA), computed across 35 industries, 9 business structures and 6 size bands.
Short answer: Some businesses
Applies when the business has industry: General insurers.
What the obligation is
BI insurance policies must clearly define pandemic exclusions per Federal Court guidance.
Two BI insurance test cases (HDI Global v Wonkana No 3; Star Entertainment v Chubb) clarified exclusion clauses + insured-peril definitions. Insurers must now have clear, current pandemic exclusions; policyholder cover for COVID-era losses limited.
The applicability test
Applies when the business has industry: General insurers.
How the regulator frames it: General insurers writing business interruption.
What triggers it: Issuing BI policies.
Jurisdiction: Commonwealth law, so the test is the same in every state and territory.
Which industries are in or out
Outcome across the 35 industries Rules Mate maps (1 of 35: yes; 34 of 35: no).
| Industry | Answer |
|---|---|
| General insurers | Yes |
| No | 34 other industries |
Business structure and size
Structure does not change the answer in general insurers: for every structure the answer is "yes".
Size does not change the answer in general insurers: at every size band the answer is "yes".
Worked examples
Each line is one run of the Rules Mate applicability engine for a single business profile, with the reason the engine gives:
- Pty Ltd company in general insurers with 6–19 employees, turnover $1M–$3M: applies. Industry: General insurers.
- Pty Ltd company in real estate agents with 6–19 employees, turnover $1M–$3M: does not apply. Requires industry: General insurers.
What you must do, and when
- When due
- Continuous.
- Frequency
- Ongoing
- Evidence to keep
- Policy wording; reinsurance arrangements; claims-handling records.
- Status
- Current
- Priority
- High
Penalty for not complying
Maximum penalty: ASIC + AFCA scrutiny on misleading or unfair claims; class action exposure.
Audit or assurance level
Rules Mate has not yet classified the audit or assurance level for this obligation. Any audit, review or certification requirement is set by the regulator source listed below.
Obligations with the same applicability test
If this obligation applies to you, so does this one: the engine uses the same rule for each.
Where it sits in the corpus
Rules Mate tracks 8 published obligations tagged "insurance", 1 of them rated critical. For a professional services Pty Ltd company with 6–19 employees operating in every state, 0 of those apply outright. This obligation is rated high priority, and is an ongoing duty.
Regulator, legislation and tools
Regulated by Australian Securities and Investments Commission and Australian Financial Complaints Authority.
ASIC: Corporate regulator administering the Corporations Act, financial services and credit licensing (AFSL/ACL), markets supervision, insolvency, and registries (ASIC and ABRS).
AFCA: External dispute resolution body for financial services, credit, insurance, and superannuation complaints. Mandatory member scheme.
Insurance Act 1973: Prudential supervision of general insurers by APRA.
Free tools that help with this obligation:
Questions
- Who must manage business interruption claim definitions (post-pandemic precedent)?
- Applies when the business has industry: General insurers.
- Do sole traders need to manage business interruption claim definitions (post-pandemic precedent)?
- Yes. Looking in general insurers and every size band, the engine's answer for a sole trader is: yes.
- Do businesses with 1–5 employees need to manage business interruption claim definitions (post-pandemic precedent)?
- Yes (1–5 employees, turnover $100K–$1M).
- When is "Manage business interruption claim definitions (post-pandemic precedent)" due?
- Continuous.
Related
Sources
Computed by the Rules Mate applicability engine from the published obligation corpus; facts last checked 3 October 2026. Rules Mate is not a law firm and this is general information, not legal advice. Confirm your position with the regulator source or a qualified adviser before acting.