Skip to main content
Rules Mate

Who must comply with doxxing criminal offence (Criminal Code s 474.17C)?

The applicability test for Comply with doxxing criminal offence (Criminal Code s 474.17C), computed across 35 industries, 9 business structures and 6 size bands.

Short answer: Specialised

A criminal offence for individuals using a carriage service — not a business compliance obligation. The Rules Mate questionnaire does not treat this as an obligation for an ordinary business.

What the obligation is

From 11 December 2024, using a carriage service to dox personal data with menace is criminal.

Sections 474.17C-474.17D of the Criminal Code (added by the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024) create criminal offences for using a carriage service to menace, harass or cause offence by publishing personal data about an individual or group. Aggravated form (motivated by prejudice based on race, religion, sex, etc.) carries higher penalty.

The applicability test

A criminal offence for individuals using a carriage service — not a business compliance obligation. The Rules Mate questionnaire does not treat this as an obligation for an ordinary business.

How the regulator frames it: All users of carriage services in Australia.

What triggers it: Publishing personal data via internet/phone/messaging to menace or harass.

Jurisdiction: Commonwealth law, so the test is the same in every state and territory.

Which industries are in or out

Outcome across the 35 industries Rules Mate maps (35 of 35: no).

The answer is the same in every industry: no. Industry does not change who must comply.

Business structure and size

Structure does not change the answer across all industries: for every structure the answer is "no".

Size does not change the answer across all industries: at every size band the answer is "no".

Worked examples

Each line is one run of the Rules Mate applicability engine for a single business profile, with the reason the engine gives:

  • Pty Ltd company in real estate agents with 6–19 employees, turnover $1M–$3M: does not apply. A criminal offence for individuals using a carriage service — not a business compliance obligation.

What you must do, and when

When due
Continuous from 11 December 2024.
Frequency
Ongoing
Evidence to keep
n/a — criminal offence; AFP prosecutes.
Status
Current
Priority
High

Penalty for not complying

Maximum penalty: Up to 6 years imprisonment for basic offence; up to 7 years for aggravated (prejudice-based).

Criminal liability

Breaches can be prosecuted as criminal offences, not only civil contraventions.

Audit or assurance level

Rules Mate has not yet classified the audit or assurance level for this obligation. Any audit, review or certification requirement is set by the regulator source listed below.

Where it sits in the corpus

Rules Mate tracks 20 published obligations tagged "privacy", 3 of them rated critical. For a professional services Pty Ltd company with 6–19 employees operating in every state, 4 of those apply outright. This obligation is rated high priority and carries criminal liability, and is an ongoing duty.

Regulator, legislation and tools

Criminal Code Act 1995: Schedule 1 = Criminal Code.

Free tools that help with this obligation:

Questions

Who must comply with doxxing criminal offence (Criminal Code s 474.17C)?
A criminal offence for individuals using a carriage service — not a business compliance obligation. The Rules Mate questionnaire does not treat this as an obligation for an ordinary business.
Do sole traders need to comply with doxxing criminal offence (Criminal Code s 474.17C)?
No. Across every industry and every size band, the engine's answer for a sole trader is: no.
Do businesses with 1–5 employees need to comply with doxxing criminal offence (Criminal Code s 474.17C)?
No (1–5 employees, turnover $100K–$1M).
When is "Comply with doxxing criminal offence (Criminal Code s 474.17C)" due?
Continuous from 11 December 2024.

Related

Sources

Computed by the Rules Mate applicability engine from the published obligation corpus; facts last checked 3 October 2026. Rules Mate is not a law firm and this is general information, not legal advice. Confirm your position with the regulator source or a qualified adviser before acting.