Who must avoid sham contracting (s 357 Fair Work Act)?
The applicability test for Avoid sham contracting (s 357 Fair Work Act) (FWO and ATO), computed across 35 industries, 9 business structures and 6 size bands.
Short answer: Only if
Applies when the business has contractors.
What the obligation is
Employer must not misrepresent employment as contractor relationship.
Sections 357-359 Fair Work Act prohibit sham contracting — misrepresenting an employment relationship as an independent contractor relationship, dismissing for the purpose of contracting, knowing misrepresentation.
The applicability test
Applies when the business has contractors.
How the regulator frames it: All employers.
What triggers it: Engaging worker as contractor when relationship is in substance employment.
Jurisdiction: Commonwealth law, so the test is the same in every state and territory.
Which industries are in or out
Outcome across the 35 industries Rules Mate maps (35 of 35: no).
The answer is the same in every industry: no. Industry does not change who must comply.
Business structure and size
Structure does not change the answer across all industries: for every structure the answer is "no".
Size does not change the answer across all industries: at every size band the answer is "no".
Worked examples
Each line is one run of the Rules Mate applicability engine for a single business profile, with the reason the engine gives:
- Pty Ltd company in real estate agents with 6–19 employees, turnover $1M–$3M: does not apply. Requires contractors.
Answers that bring it into scope
Starting from a small or large professional services company that does not otherwise meet the test, each of these single facts changes the engine's answer:
- The business engages independent contractors: it then applies (you engage contractors).
What you must do, and when
- When due
- Continuous.
- Frequency
- Ongoing
- Evidence to keep
- Contract documentation; worker status analysis; multi-factor test review.
- Status
- Current
- Priority
- Critical
Penalty for not complying
Maximum penalty: Civil penalty for individuals + corporations; underpayment recovery; tax + super exposure.
Audit or assurance level
Rules Mate has not yet classified the audit or assurance level for this obligation. Any audit, review or certification requirement is set by the regulator source listed below.
Enforcement examples
Where it sits in the corpus
Rules Mate tracks 19 published obligations tagged "workplace", 5 of them rated critical. For a professional services Pty Ltd company with 6–19 employees operating in every state, 13 of those apply outright. This obligation is rated critical priority, and is an ongoing duty.
Regulator, legislation and tools
Regulated by Fair Work Ombudsman and Australian Taxation Office.
FWO: Enforces compliance with the Fair Work Act, awards, and agreements. Investigates underpayments, brings civil penalty proceedings, and publishes compliance notices.
ATO: Federal tax administrator covering income tax, GST, PAYG, FBT, superannuation guarantee, STP, and self-managed super funds. Also administers the Director ID regime via ABRS.
FW Act: Federal workplace relations Act.
Free tools that help with this obligation:
Questions
- Who must avoid sham contracting (s 357 Fair Work Act)?
- Applies when the business has contractors.
- Do sole traders need to avoid sham contracting (s 357 Fair Work Act)?
- No. Across every industry and every size band, the engine's answer for a sole trader is: no.
- Do businesses with 1–5 employees need to avoid sham contracting (s 357 Fair Work Act)?
- No (1–5 employees, turnover $100K–$1M).
- When is "Avoid sham contracting (s 357 Fair Work Act)" due?
- Continuous.
Related
Sources
Computed by the Rules Mate applicability engine from the published obligation corpus; facts last checked 3 October 2026. Rules Mate is not a law firm and this is general information, not legal advice. Confirm your position with the regulator source or a qualified adviser before acting.